j Black Boy Joy Club
Impact and evaluation

We measure the conditions, not just the count.

Attendance tells you who walked in. It doesn’t tell you whether anyone felt welcome once they did. So we use a mixed-methods approach that measures not only what we deliver, but whether we are creating the conditions that make change possible: welcome, belonging, knowledge, confidence, trust, reciprocity and sustained community connection.

This is the framework we work to, published rather than kept for funders. If you are considering funding or partnering with the club, everything you would ask for is on this page.

The framework

What we expect to change, and how we would know.

Participation and reach

Black and Global Majority LGBTQI+ adults engage with our activities and return over time.

Indicators
Number of sessions; number of participants; new and repeat attendance; participant diversity; access support provided.
Tools and evidence
Registration forms, attendance records, access logs, monitoring forms.
Frequency
Every session; quarterly review

Welcome, safety and belonging

Participants feel welcomed, safe, affirmed and able to be their whole selves.

Indicators
% reporting they felt safe and welcomed; increased belonging; reduced isolation; feeling represented.
Tools and evidence
Post-session feedback, anonymous check-ins, participant quotes, facilitator notes.
Frequency
After each session; quarterly analysis

Knowledge, confidence and political understanding

Participants increase understanding of rights, wellbeing, services and wider social issues, and feel more confident to participate and advocate.

Indicators
Increased knowledge of rights and services; increased confidence to ask questions, speak up or seek support; examples of applying learning.
Tools and evidence
Pre/post questionnaires, reflective prompts, case studies, testimonies.
Frequency
Start/end of programme cycle; follow-up

Connection, wellbeing and help-seeking

Participants feel less alone, build supportive relationships and are more willing to access support.

Indicators
Reduced loneliness; improved mood; new supportive relationships; increased help-seeking and self-advocacy.
Tools and evidence
Wellbeing check-ins, follow-up surveys, interviews, signposting records.
Frequency
Ongoing; end of cycle; 3–6 month follow-up

Reciprocity, ownership and organisational influence

Participants help shape the space, while BBJC strengthens its systems, partnerships and wider learning.

Indicators
Member-led ideas; peer support roles; strengthened partnerships; documented learning; improved delivery model.
Tools and evidence
Co-design notes, staff records, partner feedback, internal reviews, learning reports.
Frequency
Mid-point; quarterly; annually

Help-seeking, resilience and collective capacity

Participants become more willing and able to seek support, navigate services, draw on peer networks and respond to challenges with greater resilience and collective confidence.

Indicators
Increased willingness to access mental health, primary care, sexual health or community support; increased confidence in self-advocacy; evidence of peer support; stronger social networks; participant reports of improved resilience and collective problem-solving.
Tools and evidence
Pre/post surveys, signposting records, follow-up interviews, facilitator reflections, participant testimonies, case studies.
Frequency
Start/end of cycle; 3–6 month follow-up where possible

Organisational development and sector influence

BBJC strengthens its systems, evidence base, partnerships and long-term sustainability, while also contributing learning and insight to partners, funders and the wider sector.

Indicators
New or strengthened partnerships; referrals and collaborative opportunities; improved internal systems or delivery model; documented learning outputs; partner and funder feedback; evidence that BBJC’s learning informs wider practice, collaboration or investment.
Tools and evidence
Partnership logs, project review meetings, partner feedback, internal learning reports, funding and planning records, shared outputs.
Frequency
Quarterly and annually
The logic model

From the need, to the difference.

  1. Need / context

    Black and Global Majority LGBTQI+ adults face isolation, stigma, racism, homophobia, transphobia and limited access to culturally relevant support.

    Clear understanding of unmet need and barriers.

  2. Inputs

    Funding, facilitators, lived experience, trusted relationships, venues, food, access support, partnerships and outreach.

    Resources in place to deliver safe, regular community activity.

  3. Activities

    Shared meals, walks, workshops, cultural activity, peer support, one-to-one check-ins, outreach and intergenerational dialogue.

    Participants access regular, welcoming and culturally relevant spaces.

  4. Outputs

    People attend and take part in BBJC spaces.

    Participants engage and return.

  5. Short-term outcomes

    Participants feel welcomed, safer, less isolated and more represented.

    Increased belonging, trust, confidence and immediate wellbeing.

  6. Medium-term outcomes

    Participants build knowledge, confidence, peer support and willingness to seek help.

    Improved help-seeking, stronger relationships, increased self-advocacy and resilience.

  7. Long-term outcomes

    Participants move into sustained community connection and shared ownership.

    Stronger resilience, healthier engagement with support and greater community participation.

  8. Impact

    A stronger, community-led culture of wellbeing, belonging and mutual care for Black and Global Majority LGBTQI+ adults in London.

    Reduced isolation, increased connection, improved wellbeing and a more sustainable support model.

Talk to us about it.

The full framework, the logic model and the underlying strategy are available as documents, along with the mapping between this and the members’ own words in In our own words. If you are a funder, a partner or a researcher and you want the detail behind any row above, ask.

hello@blackboyjoyclub.org